What Does Staying on Broadcom Actually Cost You?
Every VCF renewal is a negotiation you’ve already lost. Broadcom bills per core, enforces 16-core minimums, and bundles products whether you use them or not. The question isn’t if it’s expensive, it’s how expensive, and what a real alternative looks like.
This calculator models your environment, node count, CPU, and storage against the Aegis Infrastructure Modernization path and gives you two clear outputs.
First, the pure licensing delta. What you save moving from VCF to Nutanix NCI on actual cores. No minimums, no forced bundles. Hardware is excluded for a true apples-to-apples comparison.
Second, the full economic picture. Aegis is not just licensing. It’s an automated, co-managed operating model that reduces engineering time, eliminates drift, and cuts provisioning to minutes. Those gains are quantified, and any added service or transition costs are transparently netted out.
Enter your environment. The math takes seconds. The outcome is a much more informed decision.
See the 3-Year Cost Difference Between VCF Renewal and AIM
Model your environment
Estimate your 3-year VMware VCF TCO versus the Aegis Infrastructure Modernization path.
Calculation assumptions
This model reflects real-world enterprise pricing behavior and modernization patterns observed across mid-market and enterprise infrastructure environments.
Base TCO model
- Broadcom VCF licensing is modeled such that each CPU is billed at a minimum of 16 cores, regardless of actual physical core count. Your selected per-core rate is applied to this billable core count.
- Nutanix NCI software is priced at $140/core/year, applied only to actual physical cores with no minimum uplift.
- Current-state storage maintenance costs are included in the current environment TCO and eliminated in the AIM path, which assumes a full storage refresh.
- Hardware costs in the target state — compute, storage, and networking — are modeled based on current enterprise market pricing for the selected configuration and are shown transparently in the cost detail. Both paths assume a full refresh; the delta comes from licensing and managed services, not hardware.
- Storage effective capacity is modeled using a 5:1 average data reduction ratio, consistent with all-flash array performance for typical enterprise workloads.
- All savings values are rounded to the nearest thousand for clarity.
Node consolidation
- The target environment is derived internally using a fixed 2:1 consolidation ratio — your current node count is halved (minimum 3 nodes) to determine the recommended target footprint. This reflects conservative enterprise HCI consolidation benchmarks.
- The recommended UCS platform generation is selected automatically based on your current RAM per node: M5 (up to 3 TB/node), M6 (up to 6 TB/node), or M7 (up to 8 TB/node). The calculator defaults to M6 unless RAM density requires M7 or fits within M5.
- Target configurations always use 2-socket nodes at the maximum core count for the recommended generation, maximizing workload density and licensing efficiency.
- Node consolidation savings are not added separately to the headline TCO comparison — they are already captured through the difference between the current-environment hardware refresh cost and the smaller target-state hardware investment. The consolidation breakdown shown in results uses industry benchmarks ($3,000/node/yr for power and cooling, $2,000/node/yr for maintenance contracts) to make the components transparent, not to add them again.
VMC Bridge
- Approximately 10% of workloads with VMware API dependencies are assumed to require a transition bridge to AWS during migration. This cost is unique to the Aegis path and is disclosed transparently.
- The VMC bridge is modeled as a time-limited transition expense that exits at the end of Year 1. Actual scope depends on workload assessment.
IaC & operational efficiency
- IaC efficiency values are presented separately from base TCO savings and clearly labeled as operational value — not infrastructure cost reduction.
- VM density is estimated at approximately 12 VMs per node, consistent with enterprise consolidation ratios for general-purpose workloads.
- Labor hours recovered cover VM provisioning, change management, incident investigation, firmware and patch cycles, and audit and compliance preparation — scaled proportionally from a validated 12-node reference model.
- Staff burdened labor rate is modeled at $135/hr fully-loaded, inclusive of salary, benefits, and overhead. This is the only labor rate used in the model.
- Incident avoidance is modeled on industry benchmark data for environments with and without automated drift detection and change collision prevention.
- Time-to-value acceleration reflects the difference between manual and automated deployment cycles for revenue-bearing workloads in comparable enterprise environments.
- Aegis managed services and VMC bridge costs are unique to the Aegis path. These are transparently deducted from the IaC efficiency value — not hidden in the base TCO headline.
- All operational benchmarks are conservative estimates. Actual results vary by environment, team composition, and workload mix.